6,970 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 6175 · pdb #2912

Rudy Kudritzki v James “Jim” Crockett - Reason for Ruling

G 0836/1998 · 1998-06-24

Variation of order; Default interlocutory judgment; Payment into court as condition for setting aside; Liberty to apply; Leave to appeal

All PDF copies on file (1)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
98-06-24-Rudy-Kudritzki-v-James-Crockett.pdf
376.32 KB · md5 ed50602bb0f65c7bead249593eb14142
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/98-06-24-Rudy-Kudritzki-v-James-Crockett.pdf.
Full metadata
Full text14 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0836/1998
Between
Rudy Kudritzki
- v -
James “Jim” Crockett - Reason for Ruling
Before
Douglas J
Judgment delivered 1998-06-24

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS
HOLDEN AT GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN
CAUSE NO: 836/98

BETWEEN:
- **PLAINTIFF**: RUDY KUDRITZKI
- **DEFENDANT**: JAMES 'JIM' CROCKETT AND GLAS J. BEFO

REASON FOR RULING

This is an application by the defendant that, inter alia, paragraph 2 of the Order dated 9th April 1998 be varied allowing the removal of the requirement of the payment into Court by the defendant of the amount of US$125,000.00 as a condition of the setting aside of the Default Interlocutory Judgment obtained by the plaintiff on 10th March 1998 at the filing of the defence.

When the original order was made at the hearing on 9th April 1998, it was submitted, and supported by evidence that the defendant had at his disposal the amount of $125,000.00. This although not specifically conceded by the defence, was not denied and accordingly the above order was made.

At the [defend of 1st May, 1998 the Court was somehow not aware or that the ] [or consider] [A previous order only rectifiable by the Court of Appeal, edding leave to appeal was granted as prayed at paragraph the summons.]

**Dated**
24th day of June, 1998.

**Signature:**
![Signature](https://i.imgur.com/1234567.png)

**Judge:**
Kipling Douglas
Judge of the Grand Court

Find similar