7,436 judgments 29,782 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment

NXP Semiconductors Netherlands BV v Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd (in provisional liquidation) - Ruling

FSD 0001/2012 (PCJ) · 2012-06-19

Validation of post‑petition payments; s.99 Companies Law; payments made in ordinary course of business; JPL oversight of trading operations; whether court order required where prior orders already authorised ordinary‑course transactions; cross‑border insolvency protocol with Delaware Chapter 11; preservation of going‑concern sales; court declines further order as unnecessary

Full metadata
Legislation cited
Statute Sections cited Mentions
Companies Act 99 2
Full text22 paragraphs Download PDF

Use paragraph links to cite this judgment, or download the original PDF. Select text to copy a passage.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division
Cause No. FSD 0001/2012 (PCJ)
Between
NXP Semiconductors Netherlands BV
- v -
Trident Microsystems (Far East) Ltd (in provisional liquidation) - Ruling
Before
Cresswell J
Judgment delivered 2012-06-19

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS
FINANCIAL SERVICES DIVISION

CAUSE NO: FSD 1 OF 2012 (PCJ)

The Hon Sir Peter Cresswell
In Open Court on 1st June 2012

IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES LAW (2011 REVISION)
AND IN THE MATTER OF TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS (FAR EAST) LTD.

APPEARANCES: Mr. Rupert Coe of Appleby for Applicant, NXP Semiconductors Netherlands BV
Ms. Caroline Moran of Maples and Calder for the Joint Provisional Liquidators of Trident Microsystems Far East Ltd

RULING

Before the Court today is an Amended Summons, dated 25 May 2012, whereby NXP Semiconductors Netherlands BV ("NXP") apply for an Order that the payments made by Trident Microsystems (Far East) Limited (in provisional liquidation) ("the Company") to NXP between 4 January 2012 and 23 May 2012, in the sum of US$36,351,320.25, and acceded to by the Joint Provisional Liquidators ("JPLs") of the Company, shall not be avoided pursuant to Section 99 of the Companies Law (2011 Revision).

Mr. Rupert Coe appears on behalf of NXP and Ms Caroline Moran ("Ms Moran") on behalf of the JPLs.

The Company presented a petition ("the Petition") to wind itself up on 4 January 2012 on the grounds that it was insolvent. The Company is now in provisional liquidation. NXP continued to trade with the Company after the presentation of the Petition. In particular the Company made pre-payments to NXP in the sum of US$36,351,320.25 ("the Payments") between 4 January 2012 and 23 May 2012 in order to ensure that NXP would continue to supply the Company with
products and services, with the ultimate aim of preserving the Company’s group’s businesses so that they could be sold as going concerns. In return for the Payments, NXP continued to supply goods and services to the Company, and certain of the Company’s group’s businesses have been sold as going concerns, as set out in the Case Memorandum and Summary Chronology herein, to which I refer.

The Payments were made with knowledge of the JPLs of the Company. It is against this background that NXP, by its Amended Summons, asks the Court to order that the Payments shall not be void pursuant to Section 99, if and when a winding-up order is made against the Company.

This Court gave the Company the power to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course by Order dated 11 January 2012.

Paragraph 2(a) of the Order provides that the JPLs are authorized and have the power to review and supervise the day-to-day operations of the Company and the actions taken by the directors in respect of such operations.

Paragraph 4(a) provides that the directors of the Company, subject to the supervision of the JPLs, are authorised to continue to conduct the ordinary, day to day, business operations of the Company.

Paragraph 4(d) provides that the directors of the Company, subject to the supervision of the JPLs, are authorized to continue to operate the Company’s bank accounts in the ordinary course of business.

Paragraph 4(f) provides that the directors of the Company, subject to the supervision of the JPLs, are authorized to continue to operate the Company’s cash management system.

On the 25 of January this year this Court made a further Order approving the Cross-Border Insolvency Protocol ("Protocol") between the JPLs, the Company and Trident Microsystems Inc
("TMI") for the further operation of the businesses of the Company and TMI and the cooperation and coordination of the provisional liquidation and the Chapter 11 proceedings before the Delaware Bankruptcy Court.

Paragraph 6 of the Protocol provides as follows:

"TMI and [the Company] shall be permitted to operate in the ordinary course of their business operations unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court or the Cayman Court.... To facilitate these operations, the [Chief Restructuring Officer] and/or the officers and directors (or their authorized representatives) of [the Company], TMI, [Trident Microsystems Hong Kong Limited] and their subsidiaries, and the Cayman Liquidators shall meet in person or by telephone or videoconference or by whatever means is most appropriate on a weekly basis to address budgeting, cash expenditures, employee matters, ordinary course transactions and all other matters necessary to fully operate the Group's business operations."

I also refer to the other Orders made by this Court and the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, as recorded in the Case Memorandum and Summary Chronology. It is clear from the Orders referred to above that this Court has already authorized and validated all payments that are made out of the Company's assets in the ordinary course of business. The Payments that the Company has made to NXP since the filing of the Winding-Up Petition are acknowledged by Ms Moran on behalf of the JPLs today to all have been made in the ordinary course of business. In the circumstances it is, in my opinion, not necessary to make the Order sought. NXP can take comfort from the fact that they have raised the matter with the Court and have the benefit of this Ruling.

There will be no order as to costs.

DATED this 19th day of June 2012

The Honourable Justice Creasewell
Judge of the Grand Court

Find similar