Mangatal J
THIS JUDGMENT IS RELEASED
THIS JUDGMENT IS RELEASED
The Second Defendant, Joseph Pac
There was also before me
These injunctions were continued
I consider this case a
companies to sign the final Entrustment
Li Hong’s investment was recognized and commitments
The Defendants failed to comply
management or funding of Project Camping, Project
(ii) Even taking the Plaintiffs’
of damages for the loss he would have
to Dorsey and would be highly speculative
equitable right to be enforced or protected
stated purpose of the Hong Kong injunction
These Defendants therefore submit that
interest in Dorsey or the Onshore
It was also submitted that
(1) The failure to draw the
least) raised serious doubts as to the
save in a case where, by reason
These Defendants say that Mr
Reference was also made to
Reference was also made,
since the claimant had established that a
cause of action to recover that loss the
case of *R + V Versicher
Supplemental Submissions on behalf of
nothing to stop the independent directors from seeking
In relation to the Plaint
receivers over all of the shares in
about non-disclosure, and the Court
important it is, in my view,
With those considerations in mind, I do
applicants to remove the existing board of
In his 3rd
I appreciate that in the
f. The Court should take whichever course
grant an injunction restraining Ms. Li from
issues to be tried in relation to the
reason for the resignation, does to some
WHETHER DAMAGES AN ADEQUATE
on behalf of the XiO GP also
private equity funds obtain funding for its investments
he is entitled. The Shanghai Li Hong
It is relevant whether
In my judgment,