Judgment · jid 4445 · pdb #3766

Qunar Cayman Islands Limited v Maso, Blackwell, Athos, Senrigan, PAG - Judgment

FSD 0076/2017 (RPJ) · 2017-07-20

Section 238 Companies Law (2016 Revision)-approach of Court to determination f Petitions-discovery obligations of parties-whether dissenting shareholders an be ordered to give discovery-discovery by the Company and requests by xperts for further information-number of experts-judge's discretion to limit experts-judge's discretion to limit

Download PDF AI extraction 3 flags

All PDF copies on file (1)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT

17-07-20-Qunar-Cayman-Islands-Limited-In-re.pdf

3.73 MB · md5 baaa46272e7cf48270f57c77ce38f353

Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/17-07-20-Qunar-Cayman-Islands-Limited-In-re.pdf.

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 10 Jun 2026 17:27 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #54358 · quality 0.80

Text extraction

                        olmocr                                                    · olmocr-2-7b-1025                                            

633 chars in 277128 ms

LLM extraction

                        local                                                    · qwen3-next:80b                                            

parsed first try · 508657 ms

Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court

Full metadata

Cause Number	FSD 0076/2017 (RPJ)
Court	CIGC (FSD)
Judge	Parker J
Parties	Qunar Cayman Islands Limited v Maso, Blackwell, Athos, Senrigan, PAG - Judgment
Judgment Date	2017-07-20
Subject	Section 238 Companies Law (2016 Revision)-approach of Court to determination f Petitions-discovery obligations of parties-whether dissenting shareholders an be ordered to give discovery-discovery by the Company and requests by xperts for further information-number of experts-judge's discretion to limit experts-judge's discretion to limit
Filename (current)	17-07-20-Qunar-Cayman-Islands-Limited-In-re.pdf
File MD5	baaa46272e7cf48270f57c77ce38f353
Source pipeline	pdb
PDB record ID	3766
PDB URL	https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/17-07-20-Qunar-Cayman-Islands-Limited-In-re.pdf

Full text7 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division

Cause No. FSD 0076/2017 (RPJ)

Between

Qunar Cayman Islands Limited

- v -

Maso, Blackwell, Athos, Senrigan, PAG - Judgment

Before
Parker J

Judgment delivered 2017-07-20

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
For Senrigan Master Fund: Paul
PRC). It has described itself in
of Mr Levy QC in paragraph... of
-The effect of having given notices of dissent

He submits that Order

I bear in mind that

Since the Company will likely

This could in my view
communications with that expert, than a joint
Should the dissenters be ordered to give
-Where the Court relies primarily on court

It would not be a

In this case the witnesses

Find similar