6,970 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4400 · pdb #3792

In the Matter of Trina Solar Limited (Costs Appeal Leave Application) - Judgment

FSD 0138/2017 (NSJ) · 2017-12-01

Leave to appeal costs order; costs principles following dismissal/strike‑out of winding‑up petition; petitioners’ standing; inability‑to‑pay test; alleged improper purpose; alternative remedies; threshold for appellate interference with costs discretion

All PDF copies on file (1)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
17-12-01-Trina-Solar-Limited-Application-for-Leave-to-Appeal-Costs-Decision.pdf
4.32 MB · md5 b19d2fa22c5904091c0ff22ca82f6aab
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/17-12-01-Trina-Solar-Limited-Application-for-Leave-to-Appeal-Costs-Decision.pdf.

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 10 Jun 2026 06:00 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #52686 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · olmocr-2-7b-1025
839 chars in 158959 ms
LLM extraction
local · qwen3-next:80b
parsed first try · 81546 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text2 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division
Cause No. FSD 0138/2017 (NSJ)
In the Matter of Trina Solar Limited (Costs Appeal Leave Application) - Judgment
Before
Segal J
Judgment delivered 2017-12-01

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
In the present case, the question arose
should not or failing to take into account
The background in brief

The
(c). on Wednesday 5 July (
(g). on Monday 10 July
July and I indicated that it seemed to
that it intended to pay the payments due
without any evidence of or belief in the
In her skeleton argument Ms Newman Q.C
of default and the presentation of the Pet
make a winding up order is comparatively straightforward
serious default requiring a clear and strong justification
unreasonable” rather than suffer the losses
petition being presented in the context of a
demand and start the winding up process all

Find similar