Judgment · jid 4382 · pdb #3864

Fountain Medical Development Ltd v Qiao Joanne Jiang Chen - Judgment

FSD 0123/2015 (IMJ) · 2018-01-19

Section 238 of the Companies Law (2016 Revision) - Application for specific discovery - Order 24 Rule 7 of the Grand Court Rules (1995 Revision) - Expert evidence as to relevance.

Download PDF AI extraction 3 flags

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT

18-01-19-Fountain-Medical-Development-Ltd-v-Qiao-Joanne-Jiang-Chen.pdf

717.81 KB · md5 8b7baadc88759f51d63fa7a383069199

Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/18-01-19-Fountain-Medical-Development-Ltd-v-Qiao-Joanne-Jiang-Chen.pdf.

CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT

6T1IARMTJM551DFIHA053EA5A5D83F36ED8DFA355CB0AF8774B2.pdf

717.8 KB · md5 86a09731ce9a35b6686c1dcd268d40c9

Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=907 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4382 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (2)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 11 Jun 2026 06:24 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #54939 · quality 0.80

Text extraction

                        olmocr                                                    · olmocr-2-7b-1025                                            

852 chars in 221143 ms

LLM extraction

                        local                                                    · qwen3-next:80b                                            

parsed first try · 143111 ms

Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court

HIGH 10 Jun 2026 15:30 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #53939 · quality 0.28

Text extraction

                        olmocr                                                    · olmocr-2-7b-1025                                            

852 chars in 253461 ms

LLM extraction

—

required retries · 133719 ms

⚠ Hard-case: run_failed

Full metadata

Cause Number	FSD 0123/2015 (IMJ)
Court	CIGC (FSD)
Judge	Mangatal J
Parties	Fountain Medical Development Ltd v Qiao Joanne Jiang Chen - Judgment
Judgment Date	2018-01-19
Subject	Section 238 of the Companies Law (2016 Revision) - Application for specific discovery - Order 24 Rule 7 of the Grand Court Rules (1995 Revision) - Expert evidence as to relevance.
Filename (current)	18-01-19-Fountain-Medical-Development-Ltd-v-Qiao-Joanne-Jiang-Chen.pdf
File MD5	8b7baadc88759f51d63fa7a383069199
Source pipeline	pdb
PDB record ID	3864
PDB URL	https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/18-01-19-Fountain-Medical-Development-Ltd-v-Qiao-Joanne-Jiang-Chen.pdf

Full text4 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division

Cause No. FSD 0123/2015 (IMJ)

Between

Fountain Medical Development Ltd

- v -

Qiao Joanne Jiang Chen - Judgment

Before
Mangatal J

Judgment delivered 2018-01-19

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
JUDGMENT Introduction 1
22 September 2017

In accordance with the Directions

Indeed, the Second Variation
This valuation technique determines fair value by calculating
16.3. In the Pharma
Obviously, if for example a contract was
the acceptable range of disclosable calendar
a. Cost Approach The Cost Approach
financial projections and informed by historical financials
during the prior five years, other companies
years would be required as a basis for
well-established company, given the rapidity
shareholders in some other cases have been
Resolution

It is noteworthy
absence of any evidence that Dr.

Find similar