6,970 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4381 · pdb #3863

Top Jet Enterprises Ltd v Sino Jet Holding Ltd and Jet Midwest, Inc - Judgment

FSD 0106/2017 (NSJ) · 2018-01-19

Derivative action - derivative action brought in Missouri – whether the provisions of the Grand Court Rules relating to the need for leave to continue derivative actions and for representative actions apply in the case of foreign derivative actions - whether the Court can and should grant declaratory relief concerning the right of a shareholder in a Cayman company to bring a foreign derivative action

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
18-01-19-Top-Jet-Enterprises-Limited-Enterprises-Ltd-v-Sino-Jet-Holdings-Ltd-Jet-Midwest-Inc.pdf
8.5 MB · md5 5838962e3f6916e21015629aea936832
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/18-01-19-Top-Jet-Enterprises-Limited-Enterprises-Ltd-v-Sino-Jet-Holdings-Ltd-Jet-Midwest-Inc.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
5NJXE2GN80DU1EH12B33EA5D738258A983C78C09E1E27F5EB1CF.pdf
8.5 MB · md5 37bb3c1c1b3f305e9a0ca88671c34142
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=908 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4381 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 10 Jun 2026 15:36 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #54017 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · olmocr-2-7b-1025
1,563 chars in 510061 ms
LLM extraction
local · qwen3-next:80b
parsed first try · 119362 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text3 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Financial Services Division
Cause No. FSD 0106/2017 (NSJ)
Between
Top Jet Enterprises Ltd
- v -
Sino Jet Holding Ltd and Jet Midwest, Inc - Judgment
Before
Segal J
Judgment delivered 2018-01-19

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
Introduction

This case concerns the
this Court and there is a question as
But since Jet Midwest is located in Kansas
Jet Midwest would be futile because the directors
service, on 18 July,
out of the jurisdiction on Jet Midwest in
the company’s behalf will be made in
sought for wrongs done to the
nature is procedural. They confer a right
derivative claim itself, such that if
rule where there was a challenge to the
proceedings and if it this Court
satisfied on the basis of the evidence
preliminary view was that this seemed
be the date when the first notice was
conducted, in this case the Missouri
(5). Notwithstanding that a judgment
amended Originating Summons cannot be
“but it is important to have in
of Appeal had devised and the court should
Has Top Jet established the right to bring
made up of those likely to be cast
directors use their powers, intentionally or
shareholders and of Mr. Kraus
far in encouraging excessive shareholder interference with management
subject to a derivative claim (Jet Midwest
shareholder). Their failure to act or
(a). that Mr. Kraus (

Therefore Top Jet is entitled
The indemnity costs issue 49

Find similar