6,970 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4289 · pdb #2154

Lindell Wellington and Ors v Delroy Wellington - Transcript of Ex Tempore Ruling

G 0005/2016 · 2018-08-29

Civil Practice and Procedure; Application to Strike Out; Originating summons. Reasonable cause of action; Abuse of process; Frivolous and vexatious claim; Trust over property; Originating summons vs writ procedure; Conversion to trial with affidavits as pleadings

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
18-08-29_lindell_wellington_ors_v_delroy_wellington.pdf
99.91 KB · md5 3069eeefa055ad22d6976212087ab2b6
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/18-08-29_lindell_wellington_ors_v_delroy_wellington.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
6XK0H8KAF13X1DE608C1D22F8BC01FE8CFAB78853EC19394CB6D.pdf
100.73 KB · md5 af582d7db70cb484e9644ffd7304b027
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=991 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4289 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 28 May 2026 02:36 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #15587 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · granite3.2-vision:2b
4,499 chars in 298466 ms
LLM extraction
local · granite4:3b-h
parsed first try · 23900 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text7 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0005/2016
Between
Lindell Wellington and Ors
- v -
Delroy Wellington - Transcript of Ex Tempore Ruling
Before
Mangatal J
Judgment delivered 2018-08-29

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE CAYMAN ISLANDS CASE NO: G 5 of2016 AND IN CHAMBERS Appearances: Before: Heard: Delivered: Circulated: SANDRA WELLINGTON DELROY WELLINGTON Mr. Phillip Ebanks, Attorney at Law for the Plaint Mr. Delroy Wellington, Respondent in person The Hon. Justice Ingrid Mangatal 20 August 2018 29 August 2018 3 September 2018 Plaintiffs Defendant tiffs 18/9/03 Lindell Wellington & HEADNOTE Practice and Procedure - Application to Strike Out - Originating sum TRANSCRIPT OF EX TEMPORE RULING Dr. Lynval Wellington - Ex Tempore Ruling 1 of4
1. The Defend- statement of 1(a) 1(b) 1(c)

These pro-

In my judgment grounds set out in paragraph Failure to comply with 0.5, r.2 Failure to serve Notice of intention to proceed af- delay (O.3, r.6) The plaintiff's failure to provide notice of change of to the defendant pursuant to Removal of attorney, instance of another party (O.67, r.5 (b))." edings were commenced by way of originating sum- ment, the application should be refused. As regards pri 2 of the summons, 2, six months' their Attorney from record at mons filed 12 January the grounds set out in paragraph 2.

As regards to Order 18 rul- strike out an action, the does not in summons." 150903 Lindell Wellington & of the summons, none of these are a basis for striking or paragraph 1 (a) of the summons, in my judgment there is 19(5) (copy provided to the parties), makes it clear that originating summons on the ground that it discloses no prohibition in paragraph (2) against adducing eviden- tely apply to an affidavit already put in as sup- Oral argument Wellington - Ex Tempore Ruling out. In no basis made out. at "On application to to reasonable cause of ce on the application, rting the originating
5. Therefore, originating plain that the Defendant pursuant to basis of the affidavits as is it frivolous. when the Court has regard to the originating summons, summons, but also the affidavits filed by the Plaintiff, there is a reasonable cause of action disclosed. The Plaint holds the Title to the subject property on trust for the wishes of their deceased father, Isaac Wellington. same issues raised, and indeed put in issue, and ready filed by the Defendant, that the claim is neither as or vexatious. Indeed, these are very much issues that (therefore not only the in support of it), it is plaintiffs are saying that em as well as himself, it is plain to me on the conceived by various n abuse of process nor need to be tried.

Further, the made.

However, if the Plaintiff proceedings, See Order (copy also p of summons unrepresent- affidavits as Court takes into account the late stage at which the does appear to me, that this case involves serious dispo- r's attorney's submissions that there is nothing er's attorney at law, and the Plaintiffs are legally could not as originally filed, have been brought by (Rule 2). However, I exercise the Court's power provided to parties), to order the proceedings to conti- and in the circumstances of this case, particularly ned and continued. e application is being ttes as to fact. I accept o suggest that these originating summons. under Order 28 rule 8 e as if begun by a writ since the Defendant is said order that the

I therefore i. The 12 shall ii. Affi- other affic 180903 Lindell Wellington & make the following additional orders. parties are to file and serve supplemental affidavits, in September 2018. affidavits are also to stand as evidence in chief, and the affiants are to attend court for cross-examination on affits. Order by Lindell Wellington - Ex Tempore Ruling so advised, by parties and all their respective
ii. The any 2015 iv. Cost v. The matter is to be set down for a 3 day trial in open court judge (except Justice Carter), on any available date after are to the Plaintiffs, to be taxed if not agreed. Plaintiff’s Attorney-at-Law, at the request of the court, to Order for this hearing and email the same to the to come before 12 September it is to prepare Defendant. The Hon. Justice JUDGE OF THE GRAND COURT 180903 Landell Wellington & Order by Wellington - Ex Tempore Ruling 4 of 4

Find similar