6,970 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 4154 · pdb #2123

McGlynn Enterprises Ltd v Magda-Zoe Embury - Ruling on Costs

G 0049/2018 · 2019-06-26

Wasted Costs; Indemnity Costs; Summary Judgment; Wasted Costs; Attorneys; proceedings commenced of the Court's own motion; Wasted Costs; 0.62, r.12(5); need for supporting affidavit to be served on attorney personally; Indemnity costs; summary judgment; hopeless cases

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
19-06-26_mcglynn_enterprise_ltd_v_embury_magda-zoe_embury.pdf
4.57 MB · md5 28977ded679ea3104dac756758f1a513
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository/19-06-26_mcglynn_enterprise_ltd_v_embury_magda-zoe_embury.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
2HNSPWQT9GMN1FBF663C0DAB80DEA51537CDC86151C41D85D536.pdf
4.57 MB · md5 b2b547411ce090845bf8358fb4ab57de
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1106 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4154 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)

Processing-run history (1)

Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.

MEDIUM 10 Jun 2026 02:06 · pipeline 0.2.0-akn run #52200 · quality 0.80
Text extraction
olmocr · olmocr-2-7b-1025
983 chars in 223590 ms
LLM extraction
local · qwen3-next:80b
parsed first try · 103726 ms
Validation flags (3): cause_number judgment_date court
Full metadata
Full text13 paragraphs Download PDF

Extracted by the canary pipeline from the PDF (PyMuPDF for born-digital pages, vision OCR for scanned ones). Page markers and other machine artifacts are scrubbed for reading; the stored text is never modified. Hover a paragraph for its ¶ permalink. Selectable — Cmd/Ctrl-C copies whatever you've highlighted.

In the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands — Civil Division
Cause No. G 0049/2018
Between
McGlynn Enterprises Ltd
- v -
Magda-Zoe Embury - Ruling on Costs
Before
Gunn J
Judgment delivered 2019-06-26

IN THE GRAND COURT OF THE C
RULING AS TO COSTS
17.2 ...the correspondence was

Additionally, the Plaintiff complains that
17.5 Ms Embury repeatedly

Both in correspondence3 and

Much of Mr Chapman’s
(a) the attorney whom it considers to
(a) The Plaintiff had foreshadow

Mr Chapman submitted that in

Given the Plaintiff’s failure

In Al Sadik v

The words “unreason
The Law - Indemnity Costs
both Wates Construction Ltd. v.

While summary judgment is a
(7) Where the unsuccessful allegations are
The Correspondence

I

Mr Chapman did make a

There are no other matters

The manner in which Mr
ORDER (1) The Plaintiff’s
ENDNOTE: Following the circulation of my

Find similar