6,967 judgments 29,205 public-register documents 143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages
Judgment · jid 3763 · pdb #2823

John Felder v Sandra Hill - Reasons for Judgment

G 0212/2019 · 2021-09-02

The scope and application of GCR, O.19 r.9 - The legal principles under which the discretion of the Court to set aside a Default Judgment should be exercised - The importance of recognising the substantive rights of a Plaintiff duly and properly obtained in the form of a regular Judgment. Application to set aside default judgment under GCR O.19 r.9; Discretionary principles for setting aside regular judgment; Merits of proposed defence; Preservation of plaintiff’s substantive rights

All PDF copies on file (2)

Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.

PDB 20 May 2026 CURRENT
21-09-02-John-Felder-v-Sandra-Hill.pdf
4.08 MB · md5 1838415564851df4a610ba268df75f43
Downloaded 2026-05-20 from the new judicial.ky Participants-Database release at https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/21-09-02-John-Felder-v-Sandra-Hill.pdf.
CSV 13 Apr 2025 CURRENT
4XMEEL5OG9WG1FCAFC5G554709287F76AA8CEDAAC4D9F33E0F4E.pdf
4.08 MB · md5 1838415564851df4a610ba268df75f43
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1604 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=3763 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
Find similar