In the matter of the O Trust - Reasons for Decision
Further hearing of applications to stay claims made in respect of a cross-undertaking in damages and to release freezing injunctions and related relief granted in relation to those claims following earlier hearing on 1 September 2026 the Court had circulated a draft judgment but before that was handed down the Applicants notified the Court that material parts of their evidence and submissions at the 1 September hearing were incorrect the Court ordered a further hearing of the applications and the filing of further evidence whether the draft judgment should be handed down and the relief set out therein granted without amendment or whether the draft judgment and the proposed relief required amendments in view of the new evidence the parties had reached agreement on a number of important issues before the further hearing in light of the agreement reached what order was no appropriate
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
Processing-run history (1)
Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.
0.2.0-akn
run #2690 · quality 0.77
cause_number
neutral_citation
judgment_date
court
| Neutral Citation | [2026] CIGC (FSD) 13 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0205 OF 2017 (NSJ) |
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judge | Kawaley J |
| Parties | In the matter of the O Trust - Reasons for Decision |
| Judgment Date | 2026-Feb-23 |
| Subject | Further hearing of applications to stay claims made in respect of a cross-undertaking in damages and to release freezing injunctions and related relief granted in relation to those claims following earlier hearing on 1 September 2026 the Court had circulated a draft judgment but before that was handed down the Applicants notified the Court that material parts of their evidence and submissions at the 1 September hearing were incorrect the Court ordered a further hearing of the applications and the filing of further evidence whether the draft judgment should be handed down and the relief set out therein granted without amendment or whether the draft judgment and the proposed relief required amendments in view of the new evidence the parties had reached agreement on a number of important issues before the further hearing in light of the agreement reached what order was no appropriate |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | FSD0205201702232026PERRYLOPAG.pdf |
| File MD5 | 193dac489f6abe9b11e6b350637f44c2 |
| Source pipeline | pdb |
| PDB record ID | 3271 |
| PDB URL | https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository2/25-06-19-In-the-matter-of-the-O-Trust-Reasons-for-Decision.pdf |