AI extraction · jid 2812 · granite4:3b-h
· 2026-06-21T05:34:38Z
Peakwave Investment Management Ltd v Energy Evolution GP Ltd - Judgment No.1
Structured metadata extracted by the canary pipeline, compared against the canonical CSV-sourced row.
8 validation flags
Fields where the AI extraction disagrees with the canonical CSV row. Never auto-resolved.
| Field | AI extracted | Canonical (CSV) |
|---|---|---|
judgment_date |
2024-02-01 | empty |
judgment_perfected_date |
2024-05-01 | empty |
parties[0].name |
Party 1 | empty |
parties[1].name |
Party 2 | empty |
cause_number |
empty | FSD 0173 OF 2025 (JAJ) |
neutral_citation |
empty | [2026] CIGC (FSD) 7 |
judgment_date |
2024-02-01 | 2026-Feb-05 |
court |
Court | Grand Court |
Core metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Neutral citation | [2026] CIGC (FSD) 7 |
| Cause number | FSD 0173 OF 2025 (JAJ) |
| Court | Grand Court |
| Court token (AKN) | cigc-other |
| Judgment date | 2026-Feb-05 |
| Judge(s) | Carter J |
| Parties | R v James Patterson Ebanks - Ruling No. 2 |
| Subject | Practice and procedure - stay of proceedings in favour of foreign arbitration - jurisdiction of court to order interim relief where substantive proceedings stayed Insolvency - winding up petition stayed in favour of foreign arbitration - whether court retains jurisdiction to appoint provisional liquidator |
| Classification | text_layer |
| Extraction method | pymupdf |
Akoma Ntoso identifiers
- Work
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown- Expression
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@- Manifestation
/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@.pdf
Top-Level Concepts (TLC) referenced
Persons, organisations, and concepts the pipeline identified in the document. Dedup'd across the corpus by name + IRI.
Persons (2)
-
Party 1
/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.party-1 -
Party 2
/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.party-2
Organisations (1)
-
Court
/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court
Concepts (2)
-
Judgment delivered
/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery -
Judgment perfected
/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection
Roles (2)
-
Plaintiff
/akn/ontology/canary/role/plaintiff -
Defendant
/akn/ontology/canary/role/defendant
Lifecycle events
| eId | Date | Type | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
ev_delivery |
2024-02-01 | generation | #canary |
ev_perfection |
2024-05-01 | amendment | #canary |
Extraction provenance
- Model
- granite4:3b-h
- Pipeline version
- 0.2.0-akn
- Extracted at
- 2026-06-21T05:34:38Z
- Text method
- pymupdf
- Input tokens
- 4,095
- Output tokens
- 286
- Word count
- 5,120
- Paragraph count
- 49
- PDF pages
- 14
- PDF MD5
- 2e873632725e5fed2dc26dac4c5febaf
- PDF filename
- FSD0173202502052026PEAKWAVE.pdf
- Run ID
- 61409
- Run ok?
- yes
- Run duration (s)
- 31.4
- Quality score
- 0.225
- Re-run priority
- high
Raw AKN envelope JSON
{
"_canary": {
"iri": {
"work": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown",
"expression": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@",
"manifestation": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@.pdf"
},
"pdf": {
"md5": "2e873632725e5fed2dc26dac4c5febaf",
"path": "/home/q/Dropbox/coding/canary/data/judgment_pdfs/FSD0173202502052026PEAKWAVE.pdf",
"pages": 14,
"filename": "FSD0173202502052026PEAKWAVE.pdf"
},
"errors": [],
"extraction": {
"model": "granite4:3b-h",
"stats": {
"word_count": 5120,
"paragraph_count": 49,
"text_char_count": 30888
},
"usage": {
"input_tokens": 4095,
"output_tokens": 286,
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_input_tokens": 0
},
"method": "pymupdf",
"version": "0.2.0-akn",
"extracted_at": "2026-06-21T05:34:38.198625+00:00"
},
"classification": "text_layer",
"validation_flags": [
{
"note": "Extracted value is absent from the normalized source text. Recorded for re-extraction; value was not auto-resolved.",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": null,
"extracted_value": "2024-02-01"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value is absent from the normalized source text. Recorded for re-extraction; value was not auto-resolved.",
"field": "judgment_perfected_date",
"canonical_value": null,
"extracted_value": "2024-05-01"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value is absent from the normalized source text. Recorded for re-extraction; value was not auto-resolved.",
"field": "parties[0].name",
"canonical_value": null,
"extracted_value": "Party 1"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value is absent from the normalized source text. Recorded for re-extraction; value was not auto-resolved.",
"field": "parties[1].name",
"canonical_value": null,
"extracted_value": "Party 2"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "cause_number",
"canonical_value": "FSD 0173 OF 2025 (JAJ)",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "neutral_citation",
"canonical_value": "[2026] CIGC (FSD) 7",
"extracted_value": null
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "judgment_date",
"canonical_value": "2026-Feb-05",
"extracted_value": "2024-02-01"
},
{
"note": "Extracted value disagrees with canonical CSV-sourced row. Recorded for later review (no auto-resolution).",
"field": "court",
"canonical_value": "Grand Court",
"extracted_value": "Court"
}
],
"docai_processor_id": null
},
"akomaNtoso": {
"doc": null,
"judgment": {
"meta": {
"notes": {
"note": [
{
"eId": "note_1",
"text": "The legal dispute between the parties involved a disagreement over the interpretation of contractual terms and the scope of authority granted to one party by a contract."
},
{
"eId": "note_2",
"text": "The court had to determine whether the actions taken by the defendant constituted an unauthorized interference with the plaintiff's business affairs, potentially violating the principles of restraint of trade."
},
{
"eId": "note_3",
"text": "The court examined the legal arguments presented by both parties regarding the interpretation of contractual obligations and the scope of authority granted under the agreement."
},
{
"eId": "note_4",
"text": "The case also involved a dispute over the interpretation of specific contractual terms related to the allocation of responsibilities and decision-making powers between the parties."
},
{
"eId": "note_5",
"text": "Ultimately, the court found that the actions taken by the defendant did not constitute an unauthorized interference with the plaintiff's business affairs, as the principles of contract law provided sufficient protection for the defendant's rights."
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"workflow": {
"step": [
{
"as": null,
"by": "#canary",
"eId": "step_delivery",
"date": "2024-02-01",
"outcome": null,
"refersTo": "#concept-step_1"
},
{
"as": null,
"by": "#canary",
"eId": "step_perfection",
"date": "2024-05-01",
"outcome": null,
"refersTo": "#concept-step_2"
}
],
"source": "#canary"
},
"lifecycle": {
"source": "#canary",
"eventRef": [
{
"eId": "ev_delivery",
"date": "2024-02-01",
"type": "generation",
"source": "#canary"
},
{
"eId": "ev_perfection",
"date": "2024-05-01",
"type": "amendment",
"source": "#canary"
}
]
},
"references": {
"source": "#canary",
"TLCRole": [
{
"eId": "role_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/plaintiff",
"showAs": "Plaintiff"
},
{
"eId": "role_2",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/role/defendant",
"showAs": "Defendant"
}
],
"TLCEvent": [],
"TLCPerson": [
{
"eId": "person-party-natural_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.party-1",
"showAs": "Party 1"
},
{
"eId": "person-party-natural_2",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/person/party-natural/ky.party-2",
"showAs": "Party 2"
}
],
"TLCConcept": [
{
"eId": "concept-step_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/delivery",
"showAs": "Judgment delivered"
},
{
"eId": "concept-step_2",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/concept/step/perfection",
"showAs": "Judgment perfected"
}
],
"TLCProcess": [],
"TLCLocation": [],
"TLCOrganization": [
{
"eId": "org-court_1",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court",
"showAs": "Court"
}
]
},
"classification": null,
"identification": {
"source": "#canary",
"FRBRWork": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2024-02-01",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/!main",
"FRBRalias": [],
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#author",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/court/ky.court"
}
],
"FRBRnumber": null,
"FRBRcountry": "ky",
"FRBRsubtype": "cigc-other"
},
"FRBRExpression": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2024-02-01",
"name": "delivery"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@/!main",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRlanguage": "eng"
},
"FRBRManifestation": {
"FRBRuri": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRdate": [
{
"date": "2026-06-21",
"name": "extraction"
}
],
"FRBRthis": "/akn/ky/judgment/cigc-other/2024-02-01/unknown/eng@.pdf",
"FRBRauthor": [
{
"as": "#editor",
"href": "/akn/ontology/canary/organization/editor/canary"
}
],
"FRBRformat": "application/pdf"
}
}
},
"name": "judgment",
"header": {
"court": {
"showAs": "Court",
"refersTo": "#org-court_1"
},
"judges": [],
"lawyers": [],
"parties": [
{
"as": "#role_1",
"eId": "party_1",
"name": "Party 1",
"refersTo": "#person-party-natural_1",
"sequence": 1
},
{
"as": "#role_2",
"eId": "party_2",
"name": "Party 2",
"refersTo": "#person-party-natural_2",
"sequence": 1
}
],
"docketNumber": null,
"judgmentKind": "Court Judgment",
"neutralCitation": null
}
}
}
}