MM v FF Judgment (Anonymised for Publication)
Inter partes hearing on terms of Norwich Pharmacal Order - status of order made at ex parte on notice hearing - whether cross-undertaking as to damages should have be included in initial order and/or final order - whether leave to appeal exclusion of undertaking should be granted or whether review permissible under liberty to apply provision in order - whether interim payment on account of respondents costs and/or security for costs should be ordered-appropriate respondents to order - effect of acceptance of jurisdiction by some respondents on ability of others to contest jurisdiction - application of mixed up requirement to successor in title of party innocently involved in wrongdoing - need for limits on innocent partys entitlement to recover full costs of compliance - Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision), Preamble paragraph 4, Order 62 r.4(7)(h)
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
Processing-run history (1)
Every time a PDF for this judgment has been put through the AI/OCR pipeline we record what we found. Lets us decide which PDFs to re-process when a better model lands.
0.2.0-akn
run #2293 · quality 0.84
cause_number
court
| Neutral Citation | [2025] CIGC (FSD) 42 |
|---|---|
| Cause Number | FSD 0308 OF 2024 (IKJ) |
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judge | Birt JA, Field JA, Montgomery JA |
| Parties | MM v FF Judgment (Anonymised for Publication) |
| Judgment Date | 2025-May-29 |
| Subject | Inter partes hearing on terms of Norwich Pharmacal Order - status of order made at ex parte on notice hearing - whether cross-undertaking as to damages should have be included in initial order and/or final order - whether leave to appeal exclusion of undertaking should be granted or whether review permissible under liberty to apply provision in order - whether interim payment on account of respondents costs and/or security for costs should be ordered-appropriate respondents to order - effect of acceptance of jurisdiction by some respondents on ability of others to contest jurisdiction - application of mixed up requirement to successor in title of party innocently involved in wrongdoing - need for limits on innocent partys entitlement to recover full costs of compliance - Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision), Preamble paragraph 4, Order 62 r.4(7)(h) |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | FSD0308202405292005AAUU.pdf |
| File MD5 | 213e0468736907089f097df858d027a9 |
| Source pipeline | pdb |
| PDB record ID | 4456 |
| PDB URL | https://judicial.ky/n0c-storage/judgments-repository3/2026-04-17-CICA-Civ-23-of-2025-MM-v-FF-Judgment.pdf |