Judgment · jid 2431
Unicorn Biotech Ventures One Ltd et al - Reasons for Ruling
FSD 0236 OF 2024 (IKJ) · 2024-Dec-16
Case management - whether first return date of originating summons should serve as the substantive hearing - dispute as to whether proceeding should be continued as if commenced by writ - default position in the absence of agreement - Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision) Order 28 rules 4, 8, 9, Order 72 rule 4 (1)-(2) - FSD Users Guide, Section B3
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
FSD0236202412162024UNICORN.pdf
265.65 KB · md5 b068b302ce8a28da1208eea5638ecf69
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=2431 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=2991 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0236 OF 2024 (IKJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2024-Dec-16 |
| Subject | Case management - whether first return date of originating summons should serve as the substantive hearing - dispute as to whether proceeding should be continued as if commenced by writ - default position in the absence of agreement - Grand Court Rules (2023 Revision) Order 28 rules 4, 8, 9, Order 72 rule 4 (1)-(2) - FSD Users Guide, Section B3 |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | FSD0236202412162024UNICORN.pdf |
| File MD5 | b068b302ce8a28da1208eea5638ecf69 |
| Source pipeline | csv |