Annette Andrade v Patrice Frederick
Statutory Interpretation - Presumption against Implied Repeal - Rule in Pepper v Hart - even if conditions of admissibility met, court must be wary of being too ready to give effect to what was said by sponsor Bill - English Limitations Act of 1623 (21 James I, Cap 16) - Limitation period for personal injury claims in Insurance Vehicle ( Third Party Risks) Law (2021 Revision)- bar of claims against the insured after three years not impliedly repealed by Limitation Law - decisions of court of co- ordinate jurisdiction not to be followed if per incuriam.
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
| Cause Number | G 0026 OF 2014 |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2021-Feb-02 |
| Subject | Statutory Interpretation - Presumption against Implied Repeal - Rule in Pepper v Hart - even if conditions of admissibility met, court must be wary of being too ready to give effect to what was said by sponsor Bill - English Limitations Act of 1623 (21 James I, Cap 16) - Limitation period for personal injury claims in Insurance Vehicle ( Third Party Risks) Law (2021 Revision)- bar of claims against the insured after three years not impliedly repealed by Limitation Law - decisions of court of co- ordinate jurisdiction not to be followed if per incuriam. |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | 5B604UHJ9UIV1F540244FEAA55DBF02D26EC0D54343E1965C3E9.pdf |
| File MD5 | 4f541c10d588eeb65dc5689558b77d58 |
| Source pipeline | csv |