Judgment · jid 1132
Silk Road M3 Fund
FSD 0234 OF 2017 (ASCJ) · 2019-May-29
Receivers appointed by Bermuda Supreme Court over segregated account within a segregated account fund company - application by receivers for recognition of their appointment and enforcement of the terms of their order of appointment - jurisdiction of the Grand Court for the grant of recognition - how jurisdiction to be appropriately exercised - distinction between receivership and winding up proceedings - applicability of the principles of modified universalism-.
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
3IJD98U1SMF61E3H185D544F6C3D4EE3C202F151C391BE6BAE5F.pdf
10.64 MB · md5 5b14226f805ba6f9089252c6e242e8ec
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1132 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4371 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | FSD 0234 OF 2017 (ASCJ) |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2019-May-29 |
| Subject | Receivers appointed by Bermuda Supreme Court over segregated account within a segregated account fund company - application by receivers for recognition of their appointment and enforcement of the terms of their order of appointment - jurisdiction of the Grand Court for the grant of recognition - how jurisdiction to be appropriately exercised - distinction between receivership and winding up proceedings - applicability of the principles of modified universalism-. |
| Category | Financial Services Division |
| Filename (current) | 3IJD98U1SMF61E3H185D544F6C3D4EE3C202F151C391BE6BAE5F.pdf |
| File MD5 | 5b14226f805ba6f9089252c6e242e8ec |
| Source pipeline | csv |