Judgment · jid 1027
Phillip Hinds v Conyers Dill and Pearman (A Firm)
G 0065 OF 2018 · 2019-Aug-13
Civil Practice and Procedure - Striking Out - Order 18, Rule 19(1) of the GCR - whether claim an abuse of process - whether frivolous or vexatious - whether collateral attack on judgment - whether manifest unfairness to party to litigation - whether claim would bring the administration of justice into disrepute
All PDF copies on file (1)
Every PDF we hold for this judgment is listed here, including legacy versions pulled from earlier upstream pipelines. Each carries a provenance note so the source of each copy is explicit.
CSV
13 Apr 2025
CURRENT
6LO4M1RTWLJG1E56IGII498AB3C5835F176C543BAD02C1297B64.pdf
1.37 MB · md5 77a585fedc13d804dbb6c87ec1b401ca
Legacy box_files copy — originally downloaded under jid=1027 from the now-frozen judicial.ky CSV pipeline (Box.com signed-URL AJAX action=dl_bfile). Kept on disk for reference; the PDB release is the canonical current version. | re-homed from jid=4134 (identity-slide repair 2026-06-12)
Full metadata
| Cause Number | G 0065 OF 2018 |
|---|---|
| Court | Grand Court |
| Judgment Date | 2019-Aug-13 |
| Subject | Civil Practice and Procedure - Striking Out - Order 18, Rule 19(1) of the GCR - whether claim an abuse of process - whether frivolous or vexatious - whether collateral attack on judgment - whether manifest unfairness to party to litigation - whether claim would bring the administration of justice into disrepute |
| Category | Civil (General) |
| Filename (current) | 6LO4M1RTWLJG1E56IGII498AB3C5835F176C543BAD02C1297B64.pdf |
| File MD5 | 77a585fedc13d804dbb6c87ec1b401ca |
| Source pipeline | csv |
Related public-register entries