143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages

9th October 2012

2012-10-09
Metadata
Collection
Digests of Decisions
Country
Case number
Judge
Key terms
Upstream post
6252
AKN IRI
/akn/ecsc/ecsc/digest/2012/digest/9th-october-2012/post-6252
PDF versions
  • 6252-9thoctober2012grenadavideoconference.pdf current
    2026-06-21 03:32:28.292602+00 · 8,449 B

Text

PDF: 1,438 chars / 241 words. WordPress: 1,438 chars / 240 words. Word overlap: 96.0%. Length ratio: 1. Audit: moderate content delta (high). Token overlap: 97.2%.

VIDEOCONFERENCE GRENADA 9th October 2012 APPLICATION AND APPEAL Case Name: George Blaize v Bernard La Mothe (trading as “Saint Andrews Connection Radio” SAC FM Radio) [High Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2012] Coram: The Hon. Mr. Davidson K. Baptiste, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mde. Louise Blenman, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Appellant: Mr. James Bristol Respondent: Mr. Dwight Horsford with him Ms. Naeisha John Mr. Adebayo Olowu (holding a watching brief for the Attorney General) Issue: Whether rule 12.13(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2000 contravenes section 8(8) of the Grenada Constitution Order 1973 and ought to be declared null and void Result / Order: [Oral delivery]

1.The appeal is allowed.

2.It is declared that CPR Part 12.13 (b), insofar as it purports to restrict a defendant to be heard only on the matter of costs at the hearing of an assessment of damages following a default judgment, is in breach of the fair trial rights enshrined in section 8 (8) of the constitution and unconstitutional, null and void.

3.It is declared that a defendant is entitled to be heard on an assessment of damages in respect of the determination of the quantum thereof and to make submissions and cross-examine witnesses.

4.The assessment of damages is set aside and the matter be remitted to the High Court for directions and assessment of damages. Reason: Written reasons to follow.

1VIDEOCONFERENCE GRENADA 9th October 2012APPLICATION AND APPEAL Case Name: George Blaize v Bernard La Mothe (trading as “Saint Andrews Connection Radio” SAC FM Radio) [High Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2012] Coram: The Hon. Mr. Davidson K. Baptiste, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mde. Louise Blenman, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Appellant: Mr. James Bristol Respondent: Mr. Dwight Horsford with him Ms. Naeisha John Mr. Adebayo Olowu (holding a watching brief for the Attorney General) Issue: Whether rule 12.13(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2000 contravenes section 8(8) of the Grenada Constitution Order 1973 and ought to be declared null and void Result / Order: [Oral delivery] 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. It is declared that CPR Part 12.13 (b), insofar as it purports to restrict a defendant to be heard only on the matter of costs at the hearing of an assessment of damages following a default judgment, is in

breach of the fair trial rights enshrined in section 8 (8) of the constitution and unconstitutional, null and void. 3. It is declared that a defendant is entitled to be 2heard on an assessment of damages in respect of the determination of the quantum thereof and to make submissions and cross-examine witnesses. 4. The assessment of damages is set aside and the matter be remitted to the High Court for directions and assessment of damages. Reason: Written reasons to follow.

PDF extraction

VIDEOCONFERENCE GRENADA 9th October 2012 APPLICATION AND APPEAL Case Name: George Blaize v Bernard La Mothe (trading as “Saint Andrews Connection Radio” SAC FM Radio) [High Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2012] Coram: The Hon. Mr. Davidson K. Baptiste, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mde. Louise Blenman, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Appellant: Mr. James Bristol Respondent: Mr. Dwight Horsford with him Ms. Naeisha John Mr. Adebayo Olowu (holding a watching brief for the Attorney General) Issue: Whether rule 12.13(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2000 contravenes section 8(8) of the Grenada Constitution Order 1973 and ought to be declared null and void Result / Order: [Oral delivery]

1.The appeal is allowed.

2.It is declared that CPR Part 12.13 (b), insofar as it purports to restrict a defendant to be heard only on the matter of costs at the hearing of an assessment of damages following a default judgment, is in breach of the fair trial rights enshrined in section 8 (8) of the constitution and unconstitutional, null and void.

3.It is declared that a defendant is entitled to be heard on an assessment of damages in respect of the determination of the quantum thereof and to make submissions and cross-examine witnesses.

4.The assessment of damages is set aside and the matter be remitted to the High Court for directions and assessment of damages. Reason: Written reasons to follow.

WordPress

1VIDEOCONFERENCE GRENADA 9th October 2012APPLICATION AND APPEAL Case Name: George Blaize v Bernard La Mothe (trading as “Saint Andrews Connection Radio” SAC FM Radio) [High Court Civil Appeal No. 4 of 2012] Coram: The Hon. Mr. Davidson K. Baptiste, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mde. Louise Blenman, Justice of Appeal The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Appellant: Mr. James Bristol Respondent: Mr. Dwight Horsford with him Ms. Naeisha John Mr. Adebayo Olowu (holding a watching brief for the Attorney General) Issue: Whether rule 12.13(b) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2000 contravenes section 8(8) of the Grenada Constitution Order 1973 and ought to be declared null and void Result / Order: [Oral delivery] 1. The appeal is allowed. 2. It is declared that CPR Part 12.13 (b), insofar as it purports to restrict a defendant to be heard only on the matter of costs at the hearing of an assessment of damages following a default judgment, is in

breach of The fair trial rights enshrined in section 8 (8) of the constitution and unconstitutional, null and void. 3. It is declared that a defendant is entitled to be 2heard on an assessment of damages in respect of the determination of the quantum thereof and to make submissions and cross-examine witnesses. 4. The assessment of damages is set aside and the matter be remitted to the High Court for directions and assessment of damages. Reason: Written reasons to follow.

Processing runs
RunStartedStatusMethodParagraphs
15232 2026-06-21 17:44:02.472167+00 ok pymupdf_layout_text 5
5894 2026-06-21 08:18:35.916044+00 ok pymupdf_text 18