143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages

Chamber Hearing – 2nd April 2024

2024-04-02
Metadata
Collection
Digests of Decisions
Country
Case number
Judge
Key terms
Upstream post
81572
AKN IRI
/akn/ecsc/ecsc/digest/2024/digest/chamber-hearing-2nd-april-2024/post-81572
PDF versions
  • 81572-Chamber-Hearing-2nd-April-2024.pdf current
    2026-06-21 02:22:43.946553+00 · 93,199 B

Text

PDF: 5,636 chars / 947 words. WordPress: 5,645 chars / 960 words. Word overlap: 96.1%. Length ratio: 0.9984. Audit: moderate content delta (high). Token overlap: 96.5%.

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL CHAMBER HEARING 2nd April 2024 MATTERS DEALT WITH ON PAPER Before: The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Case Name: Kellon Andrews v The King [GDAHCRAP2024/0002] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (Grenada) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence Result / Order: 1. Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal his conviction for the offence of non-capital murder and his sentence of life imprisonment with a requirement to serve a minimum of 31 years and 2 months before he is to be considered for release. 2. The notice of application for leave to appeal filed on 9th January 2024 is deemed to be the notice of appeal. 3. The Registrar of the High Court shall serve a copy of this order on the applicant and the respondent within 7 days of the date of this order and shall provide proof of service thereof. Fleur Byron Cox Reason: The Court was satisfied that leave to appeal against conviction and sentence should be granted and having regard to rule 55 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Court of Appeal Rules, the Court consequently deemed the leave to appeal application as the notice of appeal. Case Name: v Nick Ltd. [SLUHCVAP2023/0003] (Saint Lucia) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Cynthia Hinkson-Ouhla Respondent: Diana Thomas Issues: Application for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application by the Appellant for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend is granted. 2. Unless the Appellant obtains an order for the appointment of a next friend within three (3) months of the date of this order, the application for an extension to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend shall stand dismissed. 3. The petition of Vincent Adrian Augier filed on 14th February 2024 is dismissed as having been improperly filed in the Court of Appeal, with liberty to refile the petition in the High Court. Reason: The Court considered section 26 (1) (b) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Saint Lucia) Act No. 25 of 2000 which governs the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and was of the view that the appointment of a next friend for the Appellant to prosecute her appeal is incidental to the hearing and determination of the appeal and thereby invokes this Court’s jurisdiction. The Court was of the view that the Appellant should be provided with a final opportunity to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend to pursue her appeal. The Court noted the High Court petition filed on 14th February 2024 for the appointment of a curator, however, the Court was of the view that the petition was mistakenly filed in SLUHCVAP2023/0003, which is an appeal against the decision of Cenac-Phulgence J dated 12th January 2021. Case Name: Darwin Blyden and Benedicta Samuels Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Blyden, deceased Estelle Wheatley [BVIHCVAP2023/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Sabals Law Respondents: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application for leave to appeal the judgment of Master Cybelle Cenac-Dantes made on 21st June 2023 is granted. 2. The applicant shall file and serve a notice of appeal within 21 days of the date of this order. 3. Thereafter the appeal shall proceed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023. Reason: The Court was satisfied that the applicant met the threshold for the grant of leave to appeal having regard to Rule 62.2(8) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 which states that leave to appeal may be given only where: (a) the court considers that the appeal would have a realistic prospect of success; or (b) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. Case Name: Vladimir Niyazov v AGON Litigation In Person [BVIHCMAP2024/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Respondent: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: An oral hearing of the application for leave to appeal be fixed by the Chief Registrar for hearing by the Full Court. Reason: Being mindful of rule 62.2(7) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 the Court fixed the matter for an oral hearing by the Full Court Case Name:

[1]Greater Sail Limited

[2]Li Jianping (also known as Gigi Lee)

[3]Mai Fan V [1] Nam Tai Property Inc. [2] Nam Tai Group Limited [3] Nam Tai Investment (Shenzhen) Co Ltd. BVIHCMAP2024/0006 (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Mr. Andrew Emery Respondent: Mr. Nicholas Burkill and Mr. Rondelle Keller Issues: Application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application for an order that the applicant’s time for filing a notice of appeal from Claim No. BVIHCom No. 2022/042 be extended until 4pm BVI time on 26th February 2024 is granted. 2. Costs in the appeal Reason: The Court considered rule 26.1(2)(k) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 (the “CPR”), the power of a single judge to extend time pursuant to rule 62.19 1 (c) of the CPR and the principles upon which an extension of time is granted. The Court was satisfied that the application for extension of time should be granted.

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL CHAMBER HEARING nd April 2024 MATTERS DEALT WITH ON PAPER Before: The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Case Name: Kellon Andrews v The King [GDAHCRAP2024/0002] (Grenada) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal his conviction for the offence of non-capital murder and his sentence of life imprisonment with a requirement to serve a minimum of 31 years and 2 months before he is to be considered for release.

2.The notice of application for leave to appeal filed on 9 th January 2024 is deemed to be the notice of appeal.

3.The Registrar of the High Court shall serve a copy of this order on the applicant and the respondent within 7 days of the date of this order and shall provide proof of service thereof. Reason: The Court was satisfied that leave to appeal against conviction and sentence should be granted and having regard to rule 55 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Court of Appeal Rules, the Court consequently deemed the leave to appeal application as the notice of appeal. Case Name: Fleur Byron Cox v Nick Ltd. [SLUHCVAP2023/0003] (Saint Lucia) Date: Tuesday, nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Cynthia Hinkson-Ouhla Respondent: Diana Thomas Issues: Application for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application by the Appellant for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend is granted.

2.Unless the Appellant obtains an order for the appointment of a next friend within three (3) months of the date of this order, the application for an extension to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend shall stand dismissed.

3.The petition of Vincent Adrian Augier filed on 14 th February 2024 is dismissed as having been improperly filed in the Court of Appeal, with liberty to refile the petition in the High Court . Reason: The Court considered section 26 (1) (b) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Saint Lucia) Act No. 25 of 2000 which governs the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and was of the view that the appointment of a next friend for the Appellant to prosecute her appeal is incidental to the hearing and determination of the appeal and thereby invokes this Court’s jurisdiction. The Court was of the view that the Appellant should be provided with a final opportunity to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend to pursue her appeal. The Court noted the High Court petition filed on 14 th February 2024 for the appointment of a curator, however, the Court was of the view that the petition was mistakenly filed in SLUHCVAP2023/0003, which is an appeal against the decision of Cenac-Phulgence J dated 12 th January 2021. Case Name: Darwin Blyden and Benedicta Samuels Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Blyden, deceased Estelle Wheatley [BVIHCVAP2023/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Sabals Law Respondents: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for leave to appeal the judgment of Master Cybelle Cenac-Dantes made on 21 st June 2023 is granted.

2.The applicant shall file and serve a notice of appeal within 21 days of the date of this order.

3.Thereafter the appeal shall proceed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023. Reason: The Court was satisfied that the applicant met the threshold for the grant of leave to appeal having regard to Rule 62.2(8) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 which states that leave to appeal may be given only where: (a) the court considers that the appeal would have a realistic prospect of success; or (b) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. Case Name: Vladimir Niyazov v AGON Litigation [BVIHCMAP2024/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: An oral hearing of the application for leave to appeal be fixed by the Chief Registrar for hearing by the Full Court. Reason: Being mindful of rule 62.2(7) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 the Court fixed the matter for an oral hearing by the Full Court Case Name:

[1]Greater Sail Limited

[2]Li Jianping (also known as Gigi Lee)

[3]Mai Fan V

[1]Nam Tai Property Inc.

[2]Nam Tai Group Limited

[3]Nam Tai Investment (Shenzhen) Co Ltd. BVIHCMAP2024/0006 (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Mr. Andrew Emery Respondent: Mr. Nicholas Burkill and Mr. Rondelle Keller Issues: Application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an order that the applicant’s time for filing a notice of appeal from Claim No. BVIHCom No. 2022/042 be extended until 4pm BVI time on 26 th February 2024 is granted.

2.Costs in the appeal Reason: The Court considered rule 26.1(2)(k) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 (the “CPR”), the power of a single judge to extend time pursuant to rule 62.19 1 (c) of the CPR and the principles upon which an extension of time is granted. The Court was satisfied that the application for extension of time should be granted.

PDF extraction

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL CHAMBER HEARING 2nd April 2024 MATTERS DEALT WITH ON PAPER Before: The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Case Name: Kellon Andrews v The King [GDAHCRAP2024/0002] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (Grenada) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence Result / Order: 1. Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal his conviction for the offence of non-capital murder and his sentence of life imprisonment with a requirement to serve a minimum of 31 years and 2 months before he is to be considered for release. 2. The notice of application for leave to appeal filed on 9th January 2024 is deemed to be the notice of appeal. 3. The Registrar of the High Court shall serve a copy of this order on the applicant and the respondent within 7 days of the date of this order and shall provide proof of service thereof. Fleur Byron Cox Reason: The Court was satisfied that leave to appeal against conviction and sentence should be granted and having regard to rule 55 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Court of Appeal Rules, the Court consequently deemed the leave to appeal application as the notice of appeal. Case Name: v Nick Ltd. [SLUHCVAP2023/0003] (Saint Lucia) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Cynthia Hinkson-Ouhla Respondent: Diana Thomas Issues: Application for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application by the Appellant for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend is granted. 2. Unless the Appellant obtains an order for the appointment of a next friend within three (3) months of the date of this order, the application for an extension to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend shall stand dismissed. 3. The petition of Vincent Adrian Augier filed on 14th February 2024 is dismissed as having been improperly filed in the Court of Appeal, with liberty to refile the petition in the High Court. Reason: The Court considered section 26 (1) (b) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Saint Lucia) Act No. 25 of 2000 which governs the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and was of the view that the appointment of a next friend for the Appellant to prosecute her appeal is incidental to the hearing and determination of the appeal and thereby invokes this Court’s jurisdiction. The Court was of the view that the Appellant should be provided with a final opportunity to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend to pursue her appeal. The Court noted the High Court petition filed on 14th February 2024 for the appointment of a curator, however, the Court was of the view that the petition was mistakenly filed in SLUHCVAP2023/0003, which is an appeal against the decision of Cenac-Phulgence J dated 12th January 2021. Case Name: Darwin Blyden and Benedicta Samuels Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Blyden, deceased Estelle Wheatley [BVIHCVAP2023/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Sabals Law Respondents: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application for leave to appeal the judgment of Master Cybelle Cenac-Dantes made on 21st June 2023 is granted. 2. The applicant shall file and serve a notice of appeal within 21 days of the date of this order. 3. Thereafter the appeal shall proceed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023. Reason: The Court was satisfied that the applicant met the threshold for the grant of leave to appeal having regard to Rule 62.2(8) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 which states that leave to appeal may be given only where: (a) the court considers that the appeal would have a realistic prospect of success; or (b) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. Case Name: Vladimir Niyazov v AGON Litigation In Person [BVIHCMAP2024/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Respondent: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: An oral hearing of the application for leave to appeal be fixed by the Chief Registrar for hearing by the Full Court. Reason: Being mindful of rule 62.2(7) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 the Court fixed the matter for an oral hearing by the Full Court Case Name:

[1]Greater Sail Limited

[2]Li Jianping (also known as Gigi Lee)

[3]Mai Fan V [1] Nam Tai Property Inc. [2] Nam Tai Group Limited [3] Nam Tai Investment (Shenzhen) Co Ltd. BVIHCMAP2024/0006 (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Mr. Andrew Emery Respondent: Mr. Nicholas Burkill and Mr. Rondelle Keller Issues: Application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The application for an order that the applicant’s time for filing a notice of appeal from Claim No. BVIHCom No. 2022/042 be extended until 4pm BVI time on 26th February 2024 is granted. 2. Costs in the appeal Reason: The Court considered rule 26.1(2)(k) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 (the “CPR”), the power of a single judge to extend time pursuant to rule 62.19 1 (c) of the CPR and the principles upon which an extension of time is granted. The Court was satisfied that the application for extension of time should be granted.

WordPress

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL CHAMBER HEARING nd April 2024 MATTERS DEALT WITH ON PAPER Before: The Hon. Mr. Mario Michel, Justice of Appeal Case Name: Kellon Andrews v The King [GDAHCRAP2024/0002] (Grenada) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

[1]Greater Sail Limited

[2]Li Jianping (also known as Gigi Lee)

[3]Mai Fan V

1.Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal his conviction for the offence of non-capital murder and his sentence of life imprisonment with a requirement to serve a minimum of 31 years and 2 months before he is to be considered for release.

2.The notice of application for leave to appeal filed on 9 th January 2024 is deemed to be the notice of appeal.

3.The Registrar of the High Court shall serve a copy of this order on the applicant and the respondent within 7 days of the date of this order and shall provide proof of service thereof. Reason: The Court was satisfied that leave to appeal against conviction and sentence should be granted and having regard to rule 55 of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, Court of Appeal Rules, the Court consequently deemed the leave to appeal application as the notice of appeal. Case Name: Fleur Byron Cox v Nick Ltd. [SLUHCVAP2023/0003] (Saint Lucia) Date: Tuesday, nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Cynthia Hinkson-Ouhla Respondent: Diana Thomas Issues: Application for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application by the Appellant for a further extension of time to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend is granted.

2.Unless the Appellant obtains an order for the appointment of a next friend within three (3) months of the date of this order, the application for an extension to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend shall stand dismissed.

3.The petition of Vincent Adrian Augier filed on 14 th February 2024 is dismissed as having been improperly filed in the Court of Appeal, with liberty to refile the petition in the High Court . Reason: The Court considered section 26 (1) (b) of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Saint Lucia) Act No. 25 of 2000 which governs the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and was of the view that the appointment of a next friend for the Appellant to prosecute her appeal is incidental to the hearing and determination of the appeal and thereby invokes this Court’s jurisdiction. The Court was of the view that the Appellant should be provided with a final opportunity to obtain an order for the appointment of a next friend to pursue her appeal. The Court noted the High Court petition filed on 14 th February 2024 for the appointment of a curator, however, the Court was of the view that the petition was mistakenly filed in SLUHCVAP2023/0003, which is an appeal against the decision of Cenac-Phulgence J dated 12 th January 2021. Case Name: Darwin Blyden and Benedicta Samuels Administratrix of the Estate of Abraham Blyden, deceased Estelle Wheatley [BVIHCVAP2023/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Sabals Law Respondents: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for leave to appeal the judgment of Master Cybelle Cenac-Dantes made on 21 st June 2023 is granted.

2.The applicant shall file and serve a notice of appeal within 21 days of the date of this order.

3.Thereafter the appeal shall proceed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023. Reason: The Court was satisfied that the applicant met the threshold for the grant of leave to appeal having regard to Rule 62.2(8) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 which states that leave to appeal may be given only where: (a) the court considers that the appeal would have a realistic prospect of success; or (b) there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. Case Name: Vladimir Niyazov v AGON Litigation [BVIHCMAP2024/0005] (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicant: In Person Respondent: No appearance Issues: Application for Leave to appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: An oral hearing of the application for leave to appeal be fixed by the Chief Registrar for hearing by the Full Court. Reason: Being mindful of rule 62.2(7) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 the Court fixed the matter for an oral hearing by the Full Court Case Name:

[1]Nam Tai Property Inc.

[2]Nam Tai Group Limited

[3]Nam Tai Investment (Shenzhen) Co Ltd. BVIHCMAP2024/0006 (Territory of The Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 2 nd April 2024 Appearances: Applicants: Mr. Andrew Emery Respondent: Mr. Nicholas Burkill and Mr. Rondelle Keller Issues: Application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an order that the applicant’s time for filing a notice of appeal from Claim No. BVIHCom No. 2022/042 be extended until 4pm BVI time on 26 th February 2024 is granted.

2.Costs in the appeal Reason: The Court considered rule 26.1(2)(k) of the Civil Procedure Rules (Revised Edition) 2023 (the “CPR”), the power of a single judge to extend time pursuant to rule 62.19 1 (c) of the CPR and the principles upon which an extension of time is granted. The Court was satisfied that the application for extension of time should be granted.

Processing runs
RunStartedStatusMethodParagraphs
10289 2026-06-21 17:17:17.199949+00 ok pymupdf_layout_text 4
952 2026-06-21 08:11:08.783818+00 ok pymupdf_text 91