143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages

Court of Appeal Sitting – 25th June 2024

2024-06-25
Metadata
Collection
Digests of Decisions
Country
Case number
Judge
Key terms
Upstream post
82095
AKN IRI
/akn/ecsc/ecsc/digest/2024/digest/court-of-appeal-sitting-25th-june-2024/post-82095
PDF versions
  • 82095-Court-of-Appeal-Sitting-25th-June-2024-Territory-of-the-Virgin-Islands.pdf current
    2026-06-21 02:21:33.415024+00 · 19,139 B

Text

PDF: 1,423 chars / 236 words. WordPress: 1,429 chars / 243 words. Word overlap: 92.1%. Length ratio: 0.9958. Audit: moderate content delta (high). Token overlap: 91.7%.

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL SITTING Territory of the Virgin Islands Tuesday, 25th June 2024 MATTER DEALT WITH ON PAPER Case Name: Vidatel Limited v PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A [BVIHCVAP2024/0013] (Territory of the Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 25th June 2024 Before: The Hon. Mde. Vicki Ann Ellis, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Yegâne Güley, Mr. Harry Oulton and Ms. Colleen Farrington Respondent: Mr. Mathew Freeman Issues: Application for an adjournment Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an adjournment filed on 21st June 2024 is granted.

2.The hearing of the Stay Application listed for 25th June 2024 is adjourned to be heard before the Full Court on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar in consultation with Counsel for the parties. Reason: The Court noted the Order of this Court dated 28th May 2024 adjourning the stay application for an oral hearing before a single judge on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar. By notice dated 12th June 2024 the stay application was listed for hearing on 25th June 2024. The applicant applied for an adjournment for that hearing, indicating that their counsel would be unavailable on the proposed date. The Court noted that the application for an adjournment of the hearing of the stay application was unopposed by the respondent and determined that the application for an adjournment should be granted.

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL SITTING Territory of the Virgin Islands Tuesday, 25 th June 2024 MATTER DEALT WITH ON PAPER Case Name: Vidatel Limited v PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A [BVIHCVAP2024/0013] (Territory of the Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 25 th June 2024 Before: The Hon. Mde. Vicki Ann Ellis, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Yegâne Güley, Mr. Harry Oulton and Ms. Colleen Farrington Respondent: Mr. Mathew Freeman Issues: Application for an adjournment Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an adjournment filed on 21 st June 2024 is granted.

2.The hearing of the Stay Application listed for 25 th June 2024 is adjourned to be heard before the Full Court on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar in consultation with Counsel for the parties. Reason: The Court noted the Order of this Court dated 28 th May 2024 adjourning the stay application for an oral hearing before a single judge on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar. By notice dated 12 th June 2024 the stay application was listed for hearing on 25 th June 2024. The applicant applied for an adjournment for that hearing, indicating that their counsel would be unavailable on the proposed date. The Court noted that the application for an adjournment of the hearing of the stay application was unopposed by the respondent and determined that the application for an adjournment should be granted.

PDF extraction

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL SITTING Territory of the Virgin Islands Tuesday, 25th June 2024 MATTER DEALT WITH ON PAPER Case Name: Vidatel Limited v PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A [BVIHCVAP2024/0013] (Territory of the Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 25th June 2024 Before: The Hon. Mde. Vicki Ann Ellis, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Yegâne Güley, Mr. Harry Oulton and Ms. Colleen Farrington Respondent: Mr. Mathew Freeman Issues: Application for an adjournment Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an adjournment filed on 21st June 2024 is granted.

2.The hearing of the Stay Application listed for 25th June 2024 is adjourned to be heard before the Full Court on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar in consultation with Counsel for the parties. Reason: The Court noted the Order of this Court dated 28th May 2024 adjourning the stay application for an oral hearing before a single judge on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar. By notice dated 12th June 2024 the stay application was listed for hearing on 25th June 2024. The applicant applied for an adjournment for that hearing, indicating that their counsel would be unavailable on the proposed date. The Court noted that the application for an adjournment of the hearing of the stay application was unopposed by the respondent and determined that the application for an adjournment should be granted.

WordPress

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEAL SITTING Territory of the Virgin Islands Tuesday, 25 th June 2024 MATTER DEALT WITH ON PAPER Case Name: Vidatel Limited v PT Ventures, SGPS, S.A [BVIHCVAP2024/0013] (Territory of the Virgin Islands) Date: Tuesday, 25 th June 2024 Before: The Hon. Mde. Vicki Ann Ellis, Justice of Appeal Appearances: Applicant: Ms. Yegâne Güley, Mr. Harry Oulton and Ms. Colleen Farrington Respondent: Mr. Mathew Freeman Issues: Application for an adjournment Result / Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1.The application for an adjournment filed on 21 st June 2024 is granted.

2.The hearing of the Stay Application listed for 25 th June 2024 is adjourned to be heard before the Full Court on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar in consultation with Counsel for the parties. Reason: The Court noted the Order of this Court dated 28 th May 2024 adjourning the stay application for an oral hearing before a single judge on a date to be fixed by the Chief Registrar. By notice dated 12 th June 2024 the stay application was listed for hearing on 25 th June 2024. The applicant applied for an adjournment for that hearing, indicating that their counsel would be unavailable on the proposed date. The Court noted that the application for an adjournment of the hearing of the stay application was unopposed by the respondent and determined that the application for an adjournment should be granted.

Processing runs
RunStartedStatusMethodParagraphs
10152 2026-06-21 17:16:30.528692+00 ok pymupdf_layout_text 3
814 2026-06-21 08:10:55.976148+00 ok pymupdf_text 21