AUGUSTIN SYLVESTER et al v SAMUEL HEDLEY FELICIEN et al

#040 SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 Suit No. 714 of 1995 BETWEEN:

1.AUGUSTIN SYLVESTER

2.ADRIENNE FELICIEN a iffs and SAMUEL HEDLEY FELICIEN and 15 others Defendant Mr. D. Theodore for Plaintiffs Mr. W. Hinkson for Defendant No.1, Samuel H. Felicien Other Defendants absent and unrepresented 1996: September 25; October 2. J U D G MEN T MATTHEW J. (In Chambers). On October 11, 1995 the Plaintiffs filed a writ of summons indorsed with statement of claim against 16 Defendants. On October 20, 1995 Elicius Ernest swore to an affidavit to the fect that he had effected service of the writ of summons on the Defendants except No. 8 - Veronica Eritagnei No. 9 - Thomas Alexander; and No. 14 - Ann Lamontagne. In the meantime there were proceedings resulting in the granting of an injunction against the first Defendant on November 15, 1995. On May 29, 1996 the Plaintiffs applied for judgment in default of appearance against all the Defendants except Defendants 8, 9, 14

16.summons was on Defendant No.1, 10, 1996 permiss to 1 8, 625 No. summons j t came 25, 1996. Lear No. at lon s compromises itioned. I out Court cannot At to enter to U.U'oiIll~U t to enter the s. serve s being case I to and on if on to wi summons as of 1 the was were ses, costs. t s ::::.:':1': to enter j appearance respect such So it lows Court can an one not seems to me, Court. states: "Where a writ is on by 2) or 3) I 5, unless wi ~ ce :it on to say, the day on it was where was on i ~ was se:... where is not was served, iff act t not entitled to enter or against or defence. II have not seen any on f summons is so as De are . .. .. ., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ., .. .. .. ~.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. A. N. J.

SAINT LUCIA IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) A.D. 1996 Suit No. 714 of 1995 BETWEEN:

1.AUGUSTIN SYLVESTER

2.ADRIENNE FELICIEN and SAMUEL HEDLEY FELICIEN and 15 others Mr. D. Theodore for Plaintiffs Mr. W. Hinkson for Defendant No.1, Samuel H. Felicien Other Defendants absent and unrepresented 1996: September 25; October 2. J U D G MEN T MATTHEW J. (In Chambers). #040 a iffs Defendant On October 11, 1995 the Plaintiffs filed a writ of summons indorsed with statement of claim against 16 Defendants. On October 20, 1995 Elicius Ernest swore to an affidavit to the fect that he had effected service of the writ of summons on 1 the Defendants except No. 8 – Veronica Eritagnei No. 9 – Thomas Alexander; and No. 14 – Ann Lamontagne. In the meantime there were proceedings resulting in the granting of an injunction against the first Defendant on November 15, 1995. On May 29, 1996 the Plaintiffs applied for judgment in default of appearance against all the Defendants except Defendants 8, 9, 14

16.summons was Defendant No.1, 10, 1996 permiss to 1 8, 625 summons j t came 25, 1996. Lear at lon s compromises itioned. I out Court cannot At t to enter the s. on s being case I 21 to and on if on to wi summons as of 1 the was were ses, costs. 13 5 s ::::.:':1': to enter j appearance respect such So it lows Court can an 7 996 No. 1 No. to enter to U.U’oiIll~U serve t one not seems to me, 10 1 4 Court. states: "Where a writ is on by 2) or 3) I 1 5, unless wi ~ ce :it on to say, the day on it was where was on i ~ was se:... where is not was served, iff act t not entitled to enter or against or defence. II have not seen any on f summons is so as De are . .. .. ., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ., .. .. .. ~.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. A. N. J.