143,540 judgment pages 132,515 public-register pages 276,055 total pages

NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK lTD v CUTHBERT SAMUEL ET Al

2002-09-23 · Saint Vincent
Metadata
Collection
High Court
Country
Saint Vincent
Case number
Judge
Key terms
Upstream post
5771
AKN IRI
/akn/ecsc/vc/hc/2002/judgment/national-commercial-bank-ltd-v-cuthbert-samuel-et-al/post-5771
PDF versions
  • 5771-23.09.02nationalcommercialbankltdvcuthbertsamueletal.pdf current
    2026-06-21 03:18:57.774436+00 · 35,184 B

Text

PDF: 1,025 chars / 177 words. WordPress: 1,025 chars / 177 words. Word overlap: 96.3%. Length ratio: 1. Audit: normalized equal (none). Token overlap: 100.0%.

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVil SUIT NO. 49ft OF 2001 BETWEEN: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK lTD Claimant and CUTHBERT SAMUEL ET Al Defendants Appearances: Mr. Samuel Commissiong for Claimant Mr. Stanley K. John for Defendants 2002: September 23 JUDGMENT

[1]ALLEYNE, J: I believe the witnesses for the Claimant. and reject the evidence of Jaimason Samuel that he was at a standstill at the time of the collision. This is clear from the evidence that the claimant's vehicle was damaged on the right front and rear doors. It is clear to me that the Claimant's vehicle had entered fully into Middle Street, and I accept that the defendant's vehicle reversed into the right side of the Claimant's vehicle. The fact that the driver Jaimason Samuel did not see the Claimant's vehicle although it was clearly in the path in which he was travelling leaves no doubt in my mind that he was negligent.

[2]Judgment for the claimant for damages to be assessed and for costs.

Brian Alleyne

HIGH COURT JUDGE

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVil SUIT NO. 49ft OF 2001 BETWEEN: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK lTD Claimant and CUTHBERT SAMUEL ET Al Defendants Appearances: Mr. Samuel Commissiong for Claimant Mr. Stanley K. John for Defendants 2002: September 23 JUDGMENT

[1]ALLEYNE, J: I believe the witnesses for the Claimant. and reject the evidence of Jaimason Samuel that he was at a standstill at the time of the collision. This is clear from the evidence that the claimant’s vehicle was damaged on the right front and rear doors. It is clear to me that the Claimant’s vehicle had entered fully into Middle Street, and I accept that the defendant’s vehicle reversed into the right side of the Claimant’s vehicle. The fact that the driver Jaimason Samuel did not see the Claimant’s vehicle although it was clearly in the path in which he was travelling leaves no doubt in my mind that he was negligent.

[2]Judgment for the claimant for damages to be assessed and for costs. Brian Alleyne HIGH COURT JUDGE

PDF extraction

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVil SUIT NO. 49ft OF 2001 BETWEEN: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK lTD Claimant and CUTHBERT SAMUEL ET Al Defendants Appearances: Mr. Samuel Commissiong for Claimant Mr. Stanley K. John for Defendants 2002: September 23 JUDGMENT

[1]ALLEYNE, J: I believe the witnesses for the Claimant. and reject the evidence of Jaimason Samuel that he was at a standstill at the time of the collision. This is clear from the evidence that the claimant's vehicle was damaged on the right front and rear doors. It is clear to me that the Claimant's vehicle had entered fully into Middle Street, and I accept that the defendant's vehicle reversed into the right side of the Claimant's vehicle. The fact that the driver Jaimason Samuel did not see the Claimant's vehicle although it was clearly in the path in which he was travelling leaves no doubt in my mind that he was negligent.

[2]Judgment for the claimant for damages to be assessed and for costs.

Brian Alleyne

HIGH COURT JUDGE

WordPress

SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CIVil SUIT NO. 49ft OF 2001 BETWEEN: NATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK lTD Claimant and CUTHBERT SAMUEL ET Al Defendants Appearances: Mr. Samuel Commissiong for Claimant Mr. Stanley K. John for Defendants 2002: September 23 JUDGMENT

[1]ALLEYNE, J: I believe the witnesses for the Claimant. and reject the evidence of Jaimason Samuel that he was at a standstill at the time of the collision. This is clear from the evidence that the claimant’s vehicle was damaged on the right front and rear doors. It is clear to me that the Claimant’s vehicle had entered fully into Middle Street, and I accept that the defendant’s vehicle reversed into the right side of the Claimant’s vehicle. The fact that the driver Jaimason Samuel did not see the Claimant’s vehicle although it was clearly in the path in which he was travelling leaves no doubt in my mind that he was negligent.

[2]Judgment for the claimant for damages to be assessed and for costs. Brian Alleyne HIGH COURT JUDGE

Processing runs
RunStartedStatusMethodParagraphs
17844 2026-06-21 18:01:24.219809+00 ok pymupdf_layout_text 5
8506 2026-06-21 08:21:11.668782+00 ok pymupdf_text 2