Mr Vitally Arkhangelsky et al v Shirley trust Co Ltd et al
- Collection
- High Court
- Country
- TVI
- Case number
- Claim No. BVIHC (COM) 70 of 2011
- Judge
- Key terms
- Upstream post
- 2133
- AKN IRI
- /akn/ecsc/vg/hc/2011/judgment/bvihc-com-70-of-2011/post-2133
-
2133-1358365340_magicfields_pdf_file_upload_1_1.pdf current 2026-06-21 03:37:02.042799+00 · 171,052 B
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL DIVISION CLAIM NO: BVIHC (COM) 70 OF 2011 BETWEEN: (1) MR VITALLY ARKHANGELSKY (2) MRS JULIA ARKHANGELSKAYA (3) OSLO MARINE GROUP PORTS LLC Applicants/Claimants (1) SHIRLEY TRUST COMPANY LIMITED (2) TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (BVI) LIMITED Respondents/Defendants Appearances: Mr Richard Millett QC, Mr Mark Forte and Mr Jerry Samuel for the Applicants/Claimants JUDGMENT [2011: 21, 30 June]
[1]The Applicants seek Norwich Pharmacal relief against each of the Respondent company registration agents. The Applicants believe that they have or may have grounds for complaint against companies administered by the respective Respondents or by those behind those companies. They are therefore entitled1 to the orders sought, subject to finalisation of their terms, upon which I shall hear Counsel.
Edward Bannister
Commercial Court Judge
30 June 2011
1 JSC BTA Bank v Fidelity Corporate Services Limited & Ors HCVAP 2010/0035
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL DIVISION CLAIM NO: BVIHC (COM) 70 OF 2011 BETWEEN: (1) MR VITALLY ARKHANGELSKY (2) MRS JULIA ARKHANGELSKAYA (3) OSLO MARINE GROUP PORTS LLC Applicants/Claimants (1) SHIRLEY TRUST COMPANY LIMITED (2) TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (BVI) LIMITED Respondents/Defendants Appearances: Mr Richard Millett QC, Mr Mark Forte and Mr Jerry Samuel for the Applicants/Claimants JUDGMENT [2011: 21, 30 June]
[1]The Applicants seek Norwich Pharmacal relief against each of the Respondent company registration agents. The Applicants believe that they have or may have grounds for complaint against companies administered by the respective Respondents or by those behind those companies. They are therefore entitled to the orders sought, subject to finalisation of their terms, upon which I shall hear Counsel. Edward Bannister Commercial Court Judge 30 June 2011 JSC BTA Bank v Fidelity Corporate Services Limited & Ors HCVAP 2010/0035
PDF extraction
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL DIVISION CLAIM NO: BVIHC (COM) 70 OF 2011 BETWEEN: (1) MR VITALLY ARKHANGELSKY (2) MRS JULIA ARKHANGELSKAYA (3) OSLO MARINE GROUP PORTS LLC Applicants/Claimants (1) SHIRLEY TRUST COMPANY LIMITED (2) TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (BVI) LIMITED Respondents/Defendants Appearances: Mr Richard Millett QC, Mr Mark Forte and Mr Jerry Samuel for the Applicants/Claimants JUDGMENT [2011: 21, 30 June]
[1]The Applicants seek Norwich Pharmacal relief against each of the Respondent company registration agents. The Applicants believe that they have or may have grounds for complaint against companies administered by the respective Respondents or by those behind those companies. They are therefore entitled1 to the orders sought, subject to finalisation of their terms, upon which I shall hear Counsel.
Edward Bannister
Commercial Court Judge
30 June 2011
1 JSC BTA Bank v Fidelity Corporate Services Limited & Ors HCVAP 2010/0035
WordPress
BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL DIVISION CLAIM NO: BVIHC (COM) 70 OF 2011 BETWEEN: (1) MR VITALLY ARKHANGELSKY (2) MRS JULIA ARKHANGELSKAYA (3) OSLO MARINE GROUP PORTS LLC Applicants/Claimants (1) SHIRLEY TRUST COMPANY LIMITED (2) TRIDENT TRUST COMPANY (BVI) LIMITED Respondents/Defendants Appearances: Mr Richard Millett QC, Mr Mark Forte and Mr Jerry Samuel for the Applicants/Claimants JUDGMENT [2011: 21, 30 June]
[1]The Applicants seek Norwich Pharmacal relief against each of the Respondent company registration agents. The Applicants believe that they have or may have grounds for complaint against companies administered by the respective Respondents or by those behind those companies. They are therefore entitled to the orders sought, subject to finalisation of their terms, upon which I shall hear Counsel. Edward Bannister Commercial Court Judge 30 June 2011 JSC BTA Bank v Fidelity Corporate Services Limited & Ors HCVAP 2010/0035
| Run | Started | Status | Method | Paragraphs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15779 | 2026-06-21 17:48:38.157417+00 | ok | pymupdf_layout_text | 6 |
| 6441 | 2026-06-21 08:19:08.261048+00 | ok | pymupdf_text | 8 |